http://galfar.vevb.net/wp/2009/08/block-compression-dxtc-and-imaging/ Oh hai! Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:08:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://galfar.vevb.net/wp/2009/08/block-compression-dxtc-and-imaging/comment-page-1/#comment-145 Marek Mauder Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:47:30 +0000 http://galfar.vevb.net/wp/?p=564#comment-145 Well, ATI's compressor is very good too. But yea, testing one image doesn't really say anything. I'll be creating some automated tool for quality comparisons of batches of images for Imaging later, so this should give more interesting results. There are also some tests of DXT compressors in "Real-Time DXT Compression" paper (link is in the article). Well, ATI’s compressor is very good too. But yea, testing one image doesn’t really say anything.
I’ll be creating some automated tool for quality comparisons of batches of images for Imaging later, so this should give more interesting results.
There are also some tests of DXT compressors in “Real-Time DXT Compression” paper (link is in the article).

]]> http://galfar.vevb.net/wp/2009/08/block-compression-dxtc-and-imaging/comment-page-1/#comment-144 JernejL Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:42:40 +0000 http://galfar.vevb.net/wp/?p=564#comment-144 Interesting that ATI's compressor beats squish, have you tried with different patterns? it could be that some algorythms favor the gradients, so it should be tested with more patterns. Interesting that ATI’s compressor beats squish, have you tried with different patterns? it could be that some algorythms favor the gradients, so it should be tested with more patterns.

]]>